tech@mandoc.bsd.lv
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@bsd.lv>
To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv
Subject: Re: Bk -words badness
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:03:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C31BC07.3090700@bsd.lv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C31B55E.3030202@bsd.lv>

>> Ingo, how goes the `Bk' work?  Scanning through mandoc's rendering of
>> current manuals, I see a lot of the following sort of breakage:
>>
>> .Bk -words
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> .Op Fl a Ar b
>> ...
> 
> The enclosed patch is a first stab at this.  It only works for explicit
> `Bk -words' for now; it's trivial to extend this to SYNPRETTY.  As you
> can see, it simply checks whether it's in a KEEP mode and resets to
> PREKEEP if it's a line subsequent the prior node.
> 
> This fixes the badness mentioned above.

...so I visually checked this against /all/ OpenBSD manuals with `Bk'
and didn't notice anything out of the ordinary except ssh-keygen(1) and
crunchgen(8).  Both exhibit block-breaking behaviour regarding `Nm' and
`Bk'.

The only systematic difference I see between mandoc and groff is that
given two `Nm' blocks in the SYNOPSIS, groff remembers the first
indentation whilst mandoc will readjust itself.  I prefer the latter,
but that's just me.

Example (edited, as groff doesn't have our awesome -Owidth=xxx option):

groff:
     newfs [-Nq] [-b block-size] [-c fragments-per-cylinder-group]
           [-f frag-size] [-g avgfilesize] [-h avgfpdir]

     mount_mfs [-b block-size] [-c fragments-per-cylinder-group]
           [-f frag-size] [-i bytes] [-m free-space] [-o options]

mandoc:
     newfs [-Nq] [-b block-size] [-c fragments-per-cylinder-group]
           [-f frag-size] [-g avgfilesize] [-h avgfpdir]

     mount_mfs [-b block-size] [-c fragments-per-cylinder-group]
               [-f frag-size] [-i bytes] [-m free-space]

If this behaviour is desired, I think it's pretty trivial to implement
given an extra state variable.

Kristaps
--
 To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-05 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-05  9:18 Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-07-05 10:35 ` Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-07-05 11:03   ` Kristaps Dzonsons [this message]
2010-07-05 22:09   ` Ingo Schwarze
2010-07-06  9:40     ` Kristaps Dzonsons
2010-07-06 22:30       ` Ingo Schwarze
2010-07-05 22:27 ` Ingo Schwarze

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C31BC07.3090700@bsd.lv \
    --to=kristaps@bsd.lv \
    --cc=tech@mdocml.bsd.lv \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).