From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se (smtp-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.175]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6R8cwj7005119 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:38:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-1.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46544157038; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:38:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-1.sys.kth.se ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp-1.sys.kth.se (smtp-1.sys.kth.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Vey1wJGndjoA; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:38:52 +0200 (CEST) X-KTH-Auth: kristaps [85.8.61.236] X-KTH-mail-from: kristaps@bsd.lv Received: from lappy.bsd.lv (h85-8-61-236.dynamic.se.alltele.net [85.8.61.236]) by smtp-1.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F62815648B; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:38:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C4E9B58.5060304@bsd.lv> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:39:52 +0200 From: Kristaps Dzonsons User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080812) X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason McIntyre CC: "tech@mdocml.bsd.lv" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bd -literal/-unfilled and old groff. References: <4C4E1FF1.5020304@bsd.lv> <20100727065352.GA7946@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20100727065352.GA7946@bramka.kerhand.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> In looking for `Sm' violators, I found that `Bd -unfilled' or `Bd >> -literal' are playing ugly with mandoc and sub-macros. >> >> The following at least brings us in line with old groff (less some >> spacing issues here and there). New groff is completely different. Sigh. >> >> Ingo, this is mostly for you. Thoughts? This at least fixes the main >> violators, like awk.1, but there could be unexpected fallout. I haven't >> been able to find any, but I didn't look too hard. >> >> Kristaps > > so, there has always been an issue that if you stick macros which change > appearance (bold or whatever) in a literal display, you get screwy > output. i wasn;t aware that it affects -filled/-unfilled types, but > there you go. > > the awk.1 stuff is probably just wrong. our old groff formatted this > nicely, but newer ones (understandably) dislike it. i think after > release i will probably convert this to a list, and remove the issue. > > on a nice side note, your diff fixes our boot_config(8) page, which also > has some .No within a literal display. it now formats as it should, and > the same as new groff. So it does! I've just committed a cleaned-up version of the patch. Thanks, Kristaps -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv