* Are Fo/Fc really block partial explicit?
@ 2011-08-28 10:44 Kristaps Dzonsons
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Kristaps Dzonsons @ 2011-08-28 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tech
Hi,
I'm working on examples for the Macros section of the mdoc book (in case
you're not online much, <http://manpages.bsd.lv>). When it came to an
block partial explicit example, I of course opted for Fo/Fc because I'd
used it in prior examples.
But it made me think: is this really properly categorised? It does have
the characteristics of block full explicit: head and body are different,
closed by explicit macro, and is block. ALL of the other block partial
explicits have no head (but Eo/Ec, which is an alien) by definition.
Thoughts? Recategorise?
Kristaps
--
To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-08-28 10:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-28 10:44 Are Fo/Fc really block partial explicit? Kristaps Dzonsons
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).