From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se (smtp-2.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.160]) by krisdoz.my.domain (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7SAivNl009032 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 06:44:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8014614D7D6 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:44:51 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at kth.se Received: from smtp-2.sys.kth.se ([130.237.32.160]) by mailscan-1.sys.kth.se (mailscan-1.sys.kth.se [130.237.32.91]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id gezeQR9HucXK for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:44:49 +0200 (CEST) X-KTH-Auth: kristaps [77.201.252.52] X-KTH-mail-from: kristaps@bsd.lv X-KTH-rcpt-to: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv Received: from [192.168.1.89] (52.252.201.77.rev.sfr.net [77.201.252.52]) by smtp-2.sys.kth.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9363814C06E for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:44:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E5A1C1E.3080609@bsd.lv> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2011 12:44:46 +0200 From: Kristaps Dzonsons User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 X-Mailinglist: mdocml-tech Reply-To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv Subject: Are Fo/Fc really block partial explicit? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I'm working on examples for the Macros section of the mdoc book (in case you're not online much, ). When it came to an block partial explicit example, I of course opted for Fo/Fc because I'd used it in prior examples. But it made me think: is this really properly categorised? It does have the characteristics of block full explicit: head and body are different, closed by explicit macro, and is block. ALL of the other block partial explicits have no head (but Eo/Ec, which is an alien) by definition. Thoughts? Recategorise? Kristaps -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv