From: Kristaps Dzonsons <kristaps@bsd.lv>
To: tech@mdocml.bsd.lv
Cc: Ingo Schwarze <schwarze@usta.de>
Subject: Re: fix blank line handling in .if
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:16:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC7610A.6050803@bsd.lv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120531102857.GA16923@iris.usta.de>
On 05/31/12 12:28, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Kristaps,
>
> Kristaps Dzonsons wrote on Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:49:56AM +0200:
>
>> Good one! As usual, do just commit and I'll look over the patches
>> in hindsight and see if anything makes me sad.
>
> Thanks, will do so tonight.
>
>> I'm particularly fond of this fix---the trailing space/newline has
>> always been annoying.
>>
>> I anticipate finally (finally!) having some free time by this
>> weekend and next week (projects rolling over), so I'll polish the
>> SQLite fixes (this will initially come with a hit to apropos
>> functionality--only OR searches, for example, but is worthwhile
>> given the massive reduction of code complexity).
>
> OK, so i will try to get that in and tested, too!
> (Or at least to nag... ;-)
>
> One thing i have to do is send a revert patch for the WARNING macro.
> A variable number of arguments for a macro is not portable.
>
>> Given Jesse's mention of many roff macros he'd like to
>> implement---few of them possible without layer violations---I'd like
>> to throw together a concept, as we've discussed before (with fear
>> and awe in our voices), of all macros thrown together and parsed in
>> a common way.
>
> I'm not sure it would be fair with respect to Jesse to do that right
> now; well, he can't get clean earth to till, but at least he should
> have a stable platform. I don't think you will get that project to
> a stable state until his time is up, so it won't help him.
> From your perspective, it's probably less work, too, to start that
> after he has moved on to diff(1) - less conflicts, in case he manages
> to produce any patches good enough for commit...
Ingo,
Oh, don't get me wrong---I fully agree. As mentioned in the last mail,
a greater priority for me is to clean out the dratted tab-handling code
in -mdoc column lists. With this cleaned up, and argument parsing
unified, there'd be a much clearer basis from which to consider a Grand
Unification of Macros.
I also want to generalise the [x]html frontend to use macro names as
classes, which would remove a lot of superfluous code. But that's an
entirely different story.
Of course, after such a long caesura, it may take a few hours simply to
remember what's where in the code-base! My local tree is a mess of
sqlite benchmarks and tests.
Best,
Kristaps
--
To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mdocml.bsd.lv
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-31 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-31 1:42 Ingo Schwarze
2012-05-31 9:49 ` Kristaps Dzonsons
2012-05-31 10:28 ` Ingo Schwarze
2012-05-31 12:16 ` Kristaps Dzonsons [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC7610A.6050803@bsd.lv \
--to=kristaps@bsd.lv \
--cc=schwarze@usta.de \
--cc=tech@mdocml.bsd.lv \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).