From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 7196 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2021 09:35:05 -0000 Received: from bsd.lv (HELO mandoc.bsd.lv) (66.111.2.12) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 7 Apr 2021 09:35:05 -0000 Received: from fantadrom.bsd.lv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 471cf275 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 04:34:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-pl1-f181.google.com (mail-pl1-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by mandoc.bsd.lv (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 20733f94 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 04:34:56 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pl1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d8so9034913plh.11 for ; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 02:34:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=anjbe-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:comments:mime-version :content-id:date:message-id; bh=Rrqetzv4fmuWxsynVvIWUe7ixSynKPZESliVv1VZ6S8=; b=z3JX6Yp2Ba4Qiyy1/n4BSqKYgL9Pt2AHnZwplT678MSHdVrRbRtx20o+erRSty5res 8nr4hwwjhh9QxSTkac2ifeBeYLP3fq6j1fq/LUhyLiD3ahEp6fkrC440CMdk2R4NXE/4 5yvUUWhsTjvvOurJYcdHaUf/EfE2glmSsH7z2lbXnZhcDUQepUCTynQBGbxM2L9OIU76 0Ktiro6Jpf/rbu+ub5mDzrpbUTsNSA0bYC5bJqwfrQj/j7qmyRimt3Q07ENnC2Zh9o8b nfwOWZ4cI7zmsLmE+/TYF1dkqHiFRxEX+gjPNfzOe33pwkg5GnP/u9rA6ntzll74VhHf uYWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :comments:mime-version:content-id:date:message-id; bh=Rrqetzv4fmuWxsynVvIWUe7ixSynKPZESliVv1VZ6S8=; b=dyIHsTZJMbCPcDh3CAV8NVJrR0GtbigqDVDfjMJcp/lZKWb/ZLvSOB4VqGhfToh1gg 915tJZAFftzo0sDJ+qRNy3cGhua9gJlTcZwYxvCuwQom7pi1hyT/9QTh0mpUuTlFe2fg WQLsgUnj5V0O2fWTub0T9VqkWVEZo6XrKjSd/wR4jzhWAwubEfTGGJ20WE9qYJoaHcym DwXO+8GpzoTuvnA3WlkTItdANi8V5+VREAyi7Yjavy1DVcwxvw0O+PQHuFPSJ2pA+YXB Dnrsap9ByPDnyPSjzMr+mbFfS4pkZTkYoXHxWlm5OwqRWzU8ESKMJiZ5xXT2DemZUS/+ Tl9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304IXkya5lQiwwp4oho8loWkMW3WKCOwq+m6Aw3gxoWHW/iJm0M Ek2MviyNVch9G7GIYZtOpBMxgsLPEw3DrvC4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxM01TkemQxSEZLRQAAMXf2A9pumMq3jp0W/yY2iYZ7k/+3ODnezsqvQP9uo4oBsef2OtIKag== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:650c:: with SMTP id i12mr2504528pjj.204.1617788094377; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 02:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desktop.ajb.soy (c-174-56-122-129.hsd1.nm.comcast.net. [174.56.122.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c128sm20725622pfc.76.2021.04.07.02.34.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Apr 2021 02:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desktop.ajb.soy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by desktop.ajb.soy (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 309abd90; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 03:34:51 -0600 (MDT) From: "Anthony J. Bentley" To: Ingo Schwarze cc: tech@mandoc.bsd.lv Subject: Re: Improper formatting of table with T& In-reply-to: References: <36636-1615006453.870094@W8oS.rk2z.-A1C> Comments: In-reply-to Ingo Schwarze message dated "Sun, 28 Mar 2021 22:36:56 +0200." X-Mailinglist: mandoc-tech Reply-To: tech@mandoc.bsd.lv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <54298.1617788091.1@desktop.ajb.soy> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 03:34:51 -0600 Message-ID: <5874-1617788091.947869@oByY.CQsf.WdU3> Hi Ingo, Ingo Schwarze writes: > I consider this line a bug in groff; it should be > > +========+=============+===========+=======================+ > > like with mandoc. > ... > If you actually wanted "+--------+------ ...", you would have > to specify > > letter & short for & example & meaning > - > > i.e. a dash rather than an equal sign after the header data. > > Do you agree? Hm, I guess so. I'm not intimately familiar with all the tbl formatting options though. > So, here is a candidate patch. When looking for the last layout row > used, we need to look at the layout row used for the previous data line > containing data, not at the previous data line outright, which might be > a horizontal ruler (as it is in this case). If it is, do not restart > from the first layout row but still proceed to the next data row, which > in this case was just read from T&. > > Does it work for you? Yes, and thanks for the analysis. > If so, is it currently OK to commit to OpenBSD, or is there something > i should pay attention to, such as release preparations or anything > else that might be relevant? No lock yet, although it's probably happening soon. Feel free to commit this with my ok. -- Anthony J. Bentley -- To unsubscribe send an email to tech+unsubscribe@mandoc.bsd.lv