From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/10190 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Shiz Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New Exherbo+musl stage: x86_64-pc-linux-musl-20160621 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:32:47 +0200 Message-ID: <02193727-F911-45D1-A2BA-289592DD6460@shiz.me> References: <20160621202207.32c23d4b@rafaela> <644E2E3D-9870-4FBC-9463-F70E1129FB98@shiz.me> <20160622122030.61bfcd2b@rafaela> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CA958058-0093-4B26-AA14-3BB946D91DA4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466609605 10550 80.91.229.3 (22 Jun 2016 15:33:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:33:25 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-10203-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jun 22 17:33:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFk9T-0002JC-Rt for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 17:33:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 19528 invoked by uid 550); 22 Jun 2016 15:33:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Original-Received: (qmail 19500 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2016 15:33:13 -0000 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2 In-Reply-To: <20160622122030.61bfcd2b@rafaela> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:10190 Archived-At: --Apple-Mail=_CA958058-0093-4B26-AA14-3BB946D91DA4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:20, Matias A. Fonzo wrote: >=20 > Distribute files and impose to your users in having xz, is a bad idea. I don=E2=80=99t think you understand what I said. Technical arguments = about the superiority of your format aren=E2=80=99t particularly relevant if the = user can=E2=80=99t decompress it in the first place. - Shiz --Apple-Mail=_CA958058-0093-4B26-AA14-3BB946D91DA4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXaq+tAAoJEI8YjKeZk+kHP/gP/RtEEJjX1CTze6eHwpJHyd5E R6rRd6AEAztEVVQEIoHl7LV/9K6wQMfyBPOWWejGSg/16fXy0RDYpE/gaIiU0xsn cUv3+INXmXNFVWgq61zrWNFI03BBf31fKFc9XrUDweo7n5sjrng8t5zrcvn1DilZ 9hol2oGyVMbhhToboPy7o58jHIMWQJbTdVmKVz525FBmzxHjmsp/C+twGqmZxjtr lUzh2g6GKPkRS2ZGpZ1qaOfXB6wrKgyp7Dj/1bJ33HsyyLmIRXibpGUCLlg75NKI xsT4Ev3INm/kd5BiCKlRNr3xjVV2HoWdA8IwmjYSdicCPNkifyG3bqEXM1A5/+zD na6xSe1ZMjqH2PsrrOtlCb3cuSqKH3+PLL/plbRjmIPa7UunJuQ2soKy21GlRSZ1 oVy4crIAPD/+hijqWwkYgtvq7z2YtfnMXtTJdGLMwWfrd3hSr+RefAne6eUtxyU1 524494mnS8z2k2sp5MBOQxC/yyzGIzLjQxlTZ0J9voCyUJWABT0061jPoqxjMqgt rm+hsG0SUQm0cnd9G7RVO4D4Ksv6EDTLG44Iotvmz1bI2f17ZP52ndqKS3mn3V8N O3Wt6MPFpDUTgv1r4k+C12A41wHppm96eP1GJ6m4ofIUZa58jjHdSyn+eMjc+Rn5 RVmXNybvfvJmpEYhMTvd =fzxI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_CA958058-0093-4B26-AA14-3BB946D91DA4--