> On 29 May 2015, at 19:13, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 07:11:18PM +0200, Shiz wrote:
> 
> What if you add a bogus prefix to all -l and -L options provided by
> the user? Then the wrapper can remove any -l or -L options without the
> prefix, then remove the prefix from the ones that remain.
> 
> Rich

This isn’t a bad idea, but it modifies the behaviour in the same way
musl-clang does, except the other way around: it will not have clang
invoke ld if only -l is supplied by the user and no object paths are,
which is what normally should happen.

I’m pretty sure I’ve devised a fix that doesn’t modify behaviour and
makes ld.musl-clang a bit cleaner as a side-effect - I’ll post an updated
patch after a bit of testing.

-S