From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2528 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Landley Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Agenda for next release? Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 22:06:12 -0600 Message-ID: <1357013172.31232.29@driftwood> References: <20121231191131.GA18334@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1357013186 13226 80.91.229.3 (1 Jan 2013 04:06:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 04:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2529-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jan 01 05:06:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tpt7i-0006Gk-9P for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 05:06:42 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 17504 invoked by uid 550); 1 Jan 2013 04:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 17496 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2013 04:06:26 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:x-mailer :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=f58Il3EXDmJHD86EsWeMU5QbelF+Cw0zFOuE9RQdEiM=; b=aU26biklMrfoo80t2VkhyA2lyeN3HMpoqpvp2gV1A4XoemLe7mwvUcm6lCmbiTW6IS MWa1ILu6xfXnzLeUM80v2ayaPT4e4OmRJYJHI5sXoaQZqdthAjztzpkuw8mJQf73WGWI FuvYKZKLHknYndwAQgn/l0B2Iy4esCsvOLYVfird2jNTwP6bleRDEhFEigDJlzL2PDXO TP0fc3pKOqGprdvlq+JGmLxEFJVsbeg5ePLpIh18oFvmekmevhRHKolDAfLNO5wyHfs+ cqrXz6c1tkIuZqFMmrPupG+lZ1Mxt/kfbgD74ww3fitWUUafN9z0HN5T+P5Vnym7ch2K u1XQ== X-Received: by 10.60.22.7 with SMTP id z7mr23666619oee.113.1357013174524; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:06:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121231191131.GA18334@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (from dalias@aerifal.cx on Mon Dec 31 13:11:31 2012) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.11 Content-Disposition: inline X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnj8wdy9ILSiz9h13xZO8zoVoN6evuhounflFSUd7KslCO3yoOAZ+NyhzCZu0PWJlW4Sxh0 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2528 Archived-At: On 12/31/2012 01:11:31 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > Another port (perhaps x32, like originally proposed) is also > definitely an option if anybody's up for doing it. I had considered > doing it myself in this release cycle, but I'm a bit busy with some > other projects for at least a couple weeks so I'd rather not get > bogged down in a big time-eater right away, and instead spend my time > with musl on small isolated feature additions and bug fixes. >=20 > Anything else I missed? From my point of view sh4, sparc32 support are interesting because =20 switching aboriginal to musl would either have to drop support for =20 those two platforms or support two libcs in parallel. (m68k and s390x =20 are of secondary interest becauase those are the platforms I've been =20 trying to add. In theory mips64 is currently supported but in practice =20 it's deeply flaky at the kernel and possibly qemu level; not widely =20 used.) Not priorities, just thought I'd chip in... Rob=