From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2604 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Landley Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: malloc(0) behaviour Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 06:58:33 -0600 Message-ID: <1358254713.32505.27@driftwood> References: <1358206649.32505.21@driftwood> <22145EB4-CF32-4BCA-8DE6-93790F3E267F@palsenberg.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358254730 20977 80.91.229.3 (15 Jan 2013 12:58:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2605-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jan 15 13:59:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tv66a-0001uP-AV for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:59:04 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 5238 invoked by uid 550); 15 Jan 2013 12:58:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 5230 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2013 12:58:47 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:x-mailer :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=p5BKBuB3Dc9o3QkV4HHJG4a/gPLEPh2Ksi1bDjemkJU=; b=OcZKR6kDI8e79PmdVaeJAulc6sZKO+KYeGZ1Now4EEygkvJD6XHEpbwZt7ChcgKEDx 9hwR9AJ5bx/xJQ3S9gRd6EBvhCFbHZZxy8Gts6bZ8eOB/I9j795pQWbOdkiGaRbW5tIt auor9/+iLxBcC3iJQJfO24UB5ydhKgJ1G0bPQCmZDgv1DrrrrQOMavDQCynNupOUWg5T x/U5AbUO/KitOBzJ+6U40wbHb414Hq1Bba45jkTkqct0RnZ3+jYqzKMhsNJnl9wrLky0 ZsBWDBl1HBzFk9/4BJuZjacHXsd3AsFLJGvX9YNpR0QR4xKMcwThZZlvCfahv+0EKcqP /X/Q== X-Received: by 10.60.154.169 with SMTP id vp9mr53404272oeb.109.1358254715632; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:58:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <22145EB4-CF32-4BCA-8DE6-93790F3E267F@palsenberg.com> (from igmar@palsenberg.com on Tue Jan 15 03:01:06 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.11 Content-Disposition: inline X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkubIW/o1UQ3iSjsU2nEeFZ9OEBkwWyfTXT8PVjy4sbv+NjluYUhiUl4CTTKt8xl01n1fmt Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2604 Archived-At: On 01/15/2013 03:01:06 AM, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > Agree. I will stay a battle until the standard only gives you one =20 > direction, and > "implementation defined" is removed from it. No, pragmatists will do the thing that makes more programs work and =20 pedants will write code that is never used by anybody. If you consider =20 you vs you a battle, have at. I'm going to stop reading this thread now. Rob=