From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2645 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: pierre Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: dladdr() Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:40:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1358862044.2172.216.camel@6-core> References: <20130115184820.GA20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1358334018.2170.23.camel@6-core> <20130116125119.GA27914@port70.net> <50F6B818.1070807@gmail.com> <20130116164943.GD20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <50F6E698.3070604@gmail.com> <20130121020335.GO20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1358751500.2196.20.camel@6-core> <20130121183523.GP20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <1358836066.2172.45.camel@6-core> <20130122130730.GB10600@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358862045 32693 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2013 13:40:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:40:45 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com, Szabolcs Nagy Original-X-From: musl-return-2646-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Jan 22 14:41:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Txe63-00014Q-97 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:41:03 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 13368 invoked by uid 550); 22 Jan 2013 13:40:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 13357 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2013 13:40:45 -0000 Original-Reply-To: pierre@silentlife.com In-Reply-To: <20130122130730.GB10600@port70.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2645 Archived-At: Nagy, > instead of 'debug mode' vs 'release mode' the > config.mak with compiler flags/architecture/.. > for the two cases > instead of 'crash' the details of the caught > signal, backtrace, memory map etc > a link to the source code or a minimal example > can help too Since I already said that I would provide this information later (I also have a job) I wonder what the purpose of these repeated calls is. PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THREAT before adding your grain of salt. > i'm not sure how populating backtrace with > dladdr works By finding the symbols that match each IP (Instruction Pointer) address. > sounds suspicious I am impressed by the value of this argument. > how do you get your backtrace? By following stack frames. I am curious to learn what better way you will find less "suspicious". Pierre