Re: time code progress

[Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@inria.fr>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 938 bytes --]

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 17.07.2013, 13:39 +0200 schrieb Szabolcs Nagy:
> (i think it did not like the syscall arg counting in case of 0 args in
> #define __SYSCALL_NARGS_X(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,n,...) n
> #define __SYSCALL_NARGS(...) __SYSCALL_NARGS_X(__VA_ARGS__,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0)
> )

yes, this is in fact not suitable to test for 0 args. For the
preprocessor 0 args basically doesn't exist, there is always one
argument, but which is empty.

If this is really needed, I could contribute a cooked down version
from P99 of an NARGS macro that could deal with such a case. Please
let me know.

Jens

-- 
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est :: http://www.loria.fr/~gustedt/   ::
:: AlGorille ::::::::::::::: office Nancy : +33 383593090   ::
:: ICube :::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536   ::
:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183   ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::



[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]