From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/4011 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Landley Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Initial work on post-1.0 roadmap Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 06:14:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1378379653.1985.4@driftwood> References: <20130828054629.GA29224@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20130830170356.GN20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1378379666 7478 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2013 11:14:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 11:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: musl@lists.openwall.com To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-4015-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Sep 05 13:14:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VHXW9-0000rp-8w for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 13:14:29 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11558 invoked by uid 550); 5 Sep 2013 11:14:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11550 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2013 11:14:27 -0000 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g/Ztay6J4tQcxJMB40kzD/0QVFWvQf8hL/GpmuokIuc=; b=Ztt5R4mweaAjO/L5PBmCd3gyarm8sKiRZTMk3muiIbuhpe+yBnuTPnRDzZMs0hASBn bYNtJ8v8AKA6w8EkjP7dpULeNkrGPRIw5NpbQRAbQAgI+S7iIRbtIg3ZVqKcsFg6TZkC AIIzWmruPH0oLHS9gteHmqL/oZN3zajqQJ+Ko7St8cuMLveLPkCHow5h0IN4evIH++FJ pxmSKSwJzHPAryXhZDb5yBSn6eMDYesNrPbWkmhTsjT/81/HdDgL+SnhTZcjeDcNm2XN rKXjxsZgrcdBVQnucKM9L3u+7JdCIzLpVCmL4To4bGn+W7pHV6Gh9QBVzXSCQ2Jti6MY MUOA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaFXxvfaezw5tr643SO8L6uxbpuuvzQ8Ot4EoYhssn/GJ6Ao+aj4MZdpdLmQXnLcJ6ukat X-Received: by 10.182.121.137 with SMTP id lk9mr6065117obb.32.1378379655588; Thu, 05 Sep 2013 04:14:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130830170356.GN20515@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (from dalias@aerifal.cx on Fri Aug 30 12:03:57 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.11 Content-Disposition: inline Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:4011 Archived-At: On 08/30/2013 12:03:57 PM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 01:46:30AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > This message is purely some notes for tracking and possible =20 > discussion > > of things to do after musl 1.0 is released. I'm leaning towards (but > > undecided) maintaining separate 1.0.x and 1.1.x branches after the =20 > 1.0 > > release, the 1.0.x being just bug-fixes and backports of =20 > non-invasive > > changes, and real development taking place in the 1.1.x series. The > > below items should probably then be arranged into a 1.1.x-series > > roadmap based on how much seems reasonable to get done per release > > (roughly, per month), and which features are in the highest demand. >=20 > One more item (well, a big multi-part item): >=20 > Security features -- RELRO processing in the dynamic linker, a > replacement for _FORTIFY_SOURCE (as a layer on top of libc's headers > rather than part of libc's headers), making it possible to build libc > itself with stack-protector, possibly nonstandard interfaces needed > for using kernel security features well, adapting malloc's footer > bookkeeping to make it difficult to preserve footer when performing > buffer overflows, ... This isn't on the wiki...? Rob=