mailing list of musl libc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@inria.fr>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Deduplicating atomics written in terms of CAS
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 08:49:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431845344.11628.1.camel@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150517045536.GA25046@brightrain.aerifal.cx>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2858 bytes --]

Hello,

Am Sonntag, den 17.05.2015, 00:55 -0400 schrieb Rich Felker:
> Lots of archs define most or all of their atomics except a_cas in
> terms of a_cas. The attached atomic.h is a proposed replacement for
> arch-specific atomic.h that would live in src/internal. The arch
> atomic.h files would be replaced with atomic_arch.h, which could opt
> to define nothing but a_cas, or could define more primitives itself if
> it can do so more efficiently.

I like the approach

> The second attachment, atomic_generic.h, is an implementation of the
> atomics (and other non-atomic ops we've traditionally had in atomic.h)
> using GNU C builtins. This file can be used as-is for any new archs
> that satisfy the following conditions:
>
> - They're not supported by compilers too old to have the __sync_*
>   builtins.
> 
> - They don't need runtime switching/detection of atomic
>   implementations.
> 
> - GCC doesn't generate pathologically bad code for the builtins.

shouldn't this file then define or macros such as a_swap, too ?

On quick inspection I found issues with the two 64 bit functions:

#ifndef a_and_64
static inline void a_and_64(volatile uint64_t *p, uint64_t v)
{
        union { uint64_t v; uint32_t r[2]; } u = { v };
        if (u.r[0]+1) a_and((int *)p, u.r[0]);
        if (u.r[1]+1) a_and((int *)p+1, u.r[1]);
}
#endif

#ifndef a_or_64
static inline void a_or_64(volatile uint64_t *p, uint64_t v)
{
        union { uint64_t v; uint32_t r[2]; } u = { v };
        if (u.r[0]) a_or((int *)p, u.r[0]);
        if (u.r[1]) a_or((int *)p+1, u.r[1]);
}
#endif

First I don't get it how we can expect these to be be atomic. It looks
to me that the two 32 bit words can be updated with quite a laps of
time between them if the thread is delayed. I didn't check this, do we
really need 64bit atomics?

Then, the mix of uint32_t and int is unfortunate. This code is in
header files and thus visible to all compilation units, especially
user code that might use any optimization option that the compiler
offers. The cast to int* breaks aliasing rules, so compilers that are
used with aggressive optimization may produce wrong executables, in
pretending that *p didn't change.

I only recently learned that even cast to volatile doesn't help in
cases where the original object to which p points is not declared
volatile. The C standard states that only volatile *declared* objects
are subject to the rules of volatile. Accessing through a volatile
pointer doesn't help.

Jens

-- 
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est ::: Camus ::::::: ICube/ICPS :::
:: ::::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536   ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183   ::
:: ::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::
:: http://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt ::




[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-17  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-17  4:55 Rich Felker
2015-05-17  6:00 ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-17  6:14   ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17  7:37     ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17 16:28       ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 16:59         ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17 17:59           ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 22:23             ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17 22:33               ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 23:22                 ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-18 10:19               ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-05-18 11:03                 ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17  6:49 ` Jens Gustedt [this message]
2015-05-17 16:22   ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 17:19     ` Jens Gustedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1431845344.11628.1.camel@inria.fr \
    --to=jens.gustedt@inria.fr \
    --cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).