From: Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@inria.fr>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Deduplicating atomics written in terms of CAS
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 13:03:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1431947010.27572.1.camel@inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518101933.GD11258@port70.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1951 bytes --]
Am Montag, den 18.05.2015, 12:19 +0200 schrieb Szabolcs Nagy:
> * Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@inria.fr> [2015-05-18 00:23:07 +0200]:
> >
> > The advantage of C11's model for atomic is that this a qualifier, and
> > then the compiler automatically checks (or ensures) that all accesses
> > are atomic. We don't have that luxury, here, but we could get a bit
> > closer to it.
> >
>
> the qualifierness of atomic is a bit confusing
>
> differently qualified types had the same alignment and representation
> so far and in some cases pointers to differently qualified types are
> implicitly convertible (eg assigning char* to const char* is ok).
>
> atomic is special: when the standard says 'qualified or unqualified type'
> it does not include _Atomic even though it is called a qualifier.
> (atomic is always mentioned explicitly, it can have different representation
> and alignment to allow implementation with locks and thus the pointers
> cannot be convertible)
>
> annotating everything with _Atomic in musl is problematic because the
> atomic bits are publicly visible in pthread types (we could use _Atomic
> only when building musl, but i think its usefulness should be demonstrated
> with examples etc before doing something that ugly.. having a_load_relaxed
> without typesystem help does not sound very useful)
I didn't say that I wanted to use _Atomic, we can't do that for
obvious reasons. I just want to hide the atomic objects behind a
typedef, such that production compiles generate exactly the same
binary, but that we also can use the compiler to have a check for
consistency.
Jens
--
:: INRIA Nancy Grand Est ::: Camus ::::::: ICube/ICPS :::
:: ::::::::::::::: office Strasbourg : +33 368854536 ::
:: :::::::::::::::::::::: gsm France : +33 651400183 ::
:: ::::::::::::::: gsm international : +49 15737185122 ::
:: http://icube-icps.unistra.fr/index.php/Jens_Gustedt ::
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-17 4:55 Rich Felker
2015-05-17 6:00 ` Alexander Monakov
2015-05-17 6:14 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 7:37 ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17 16:28 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 16:59 ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17 17:59 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 22:23 ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17 22:33 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 23:22 ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-18 10:19 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2015-05-18 11:03 ` Jens Gustedt [this message]
2015-05-17 6:49 ` Jens Gustedt
2015-05-17 16:22 ` Rich Felker
2015-05-17 17:19 ` Jens Gustedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1431947010.27572.1.camel@inria.fr \
--to=jens.gustedt@inria.fr \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).