From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9077 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2020 19:29:04 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 12 Jun 2020 19:29:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 3571 invoked by uid 550); 12 Jun 2020 19:28:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 1499 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2020 19:24:19 -0000 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dereferenced.org; s=default; t=1591989847; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+EOiTNjUYkg1KxuhCdz2MMQOrYYC0/G2s4Z38esC/9Q=; b=Pt5YSCa3ytQ7vPtOSoNE+poQfHNWM0FL9fHL30QSNKUa+b2n46rw6gHGxGX9K58vphlWId UkI1ZXsbxDa8ptq6l5tG8bgvpvUEALVj56AUDIqOdvAUU3fhfq1kIrybrNYOIWQMLF6SZy EbPFEG8zh7jF+BeAnyM1i6w7ktUOMW0= From: Ariadne Conill To: musl@lists.openwall.com Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 13:24:03 -0600 Message-ID: <1702197.Euugps0dR9@localhost> In-Reply-To: <8d5c1e37-b650-fe70-4dba-05ece843cba1@samersoff.net> References: <20200612173747.GD6430@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <8d5c1e37-b650-fe70-4dba-05ece843cba1@samersoff.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [musl] Advocating musl to in windows subsystem and OS X Hello, On Friday, June 12, 2020 1:08:26 PM MDT Dmitry Samersoff wrote: > Hello Rich, > > One thing that might make sense - is to compare performance and resource > consumption of OpenBSD and Musl based Linux distro (e.g. Alpine) because > both targets the same audience. I don't think Alpine or other apk-based distributions like Adelie are appropriate for such a comparison. While it is true that we consume musl, we layer other things (for example, libucontext, GNU libiconv, GNU libintl) on top of it to fill in the gaps. Accordingly, on Alpine you don't get a "pure" musl experience as you would with, say, sabotage. Ariadne