> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> > Is anyone working on getting STLport working with musl?
> >
> >
> > I had a quick look at the STLport sources and it seems to assume
> > glibc is in use if the toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting
> > effort is required to get it working with musl.

> Is there a reason you want to use STLport rather than libstdc++ or
> libc++? My impression was that STLport was outdated, unmaintained,
> and
> full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s...

> Rich

Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of copyleft code, which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but I have no allegiance to STLport so will look into it. 

Is anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl?