From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/2513 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Grant Gray Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: STLport Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 14:00:53 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <1716568.15394.1356922853329.JavaMail.root@grantgray.id.au> References: <20121231020607.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15393_561106.1356922853329" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356922879 6202 80.91.229.3 (31 Dec 2012 03:01:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 03:01:19 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-2514-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Dec 31 04:01:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TpVd0-0000ca-Lx for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:01:26 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 19883 invoked by uid 550); 31 Dec 2012 03:01:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 19870 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2012 03:01:10 -0000 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.grantgray.id.au In-Reply-To: <20121231020607.GJ20323@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Originating-IP: [27.253.54.200] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.0_GA_2669 (ZimbraWebClient - GC23 (Linux)/7.2.0_GA_2669) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:2513 Archived-At: ------=_Part_15393_561106.1356922853329 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > > > Is anyone working on getting STLport working with musl? > > > > > > I had a quick look at the STLport sources and it seems to assume > > glibc is in use if the toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting > > effort is required to get it working with musl. > Is there a reason you want to use STLport rather than libstdc++ or > libc++? My impression was that STLport was outdated, unmaintained, > and > full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s... > Rich Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of copyleft code, which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but I have no allegiance to STLport so will look into it. Is anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl? ------=_Part_15393_561106.1356922853329 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <= div style=3D'font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: = 12pt; color: #000000'>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:11:18PM +1100, Grant Gray wr= ote:
> Hi list,
>
>
> Is anyone working on getti= ng STLport working with musl?
>
>
> I had a quick look= at the STLport sources and it seems to assume
> glibc is in use if t= he toolchain is GCC, so it seems some porting
> effort is required to= get it working with musl.

Is there a reason you want to use STLport= rather than libstdc++ or
libc++? My impression was that STLport was out= dated, unmaintained, and
full of ugly legacy hackery from the 90s...
=
Rich
Licensing is the issue. I'm building a userland free of cop= yleft code, which rules out libstdc++. I haven't investigated libc++, but I= have no allegiance to STLport so will look into it.

I= s anyone already working on a libc++ integration with musl?

<= /div>
------=_Part_15393_561106.1356922853329--