From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/13996
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general,gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs
Subject: Re: posix_spawn_file_actions_add* functions on musl libc
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:23:16 +0100
Message-ID: <1764808.lGQ7o5Mx7G@omega>
References: <17480807.kbxdrRNLtY@omega> <20190324141658.GR23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="163580"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-141-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )
Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, musl@lists.openwall.com
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Original-X-From: musl-return-14012-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Mar 24 19:23:36 2019
Return-path: <musl-return-14012-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by blaine.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-14012-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1h87mP-000gKO-98
	for gllmg-musl@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 19:23:35 +0100
Original-Received: (qmail 30070 invoked by uid 550); 24 Mar 2019 18:23:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-ID: <musl.lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 30036 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2019 18:23:30 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1553451798;
	s=strato-dkim-0002; d=clisp.org;
	h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:
	X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender;
	bh=U5fzWHUdi/uEv4w2ygJWL6ZeixtKe9YLvnK6KG1wviQ=;
	b=UvtE0ZtQwScfS4s6wBPpL2O47tArNxY5sX8BBcXMwGMV6ClGen7K6Ald7pCbmf4QlA
	Rj3U5RZz4craBThvJf37kG5tFTRaMKs5nBN44nre7ILwUb3Sx+EmWoSEJ7TPez3WvHsk
	gduzkWoQqC5J/F4MvK6QJ5oWW/Q4LrLuf8/sse7DTCBOAzAFPFLClulI+2qyo7hFXPBP
	+k7wV3bUe+8dCQBdM34gqjypCTeuEUDtTIrmk+OiTGWc3eFeiqyZeyUJXBK/4tcS/de1
	1j++4fZSutpbTfNlIcYupj5UgeqOQ4vQBv1BoV0v3YmXl6gm6DDhPamOrdojXLGUCMS5
	/Mng==
X-RZG-AUTH: ":Ln4Re0+Ic/6oZXR1YgKryK8brlshOcZlIWs+iCP5vnk6shH+AHjwLuWOGKf3zZFW"
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
In-Reply-To: <20190324141658.GR23599@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:13996 gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs:40230
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/13996>

Hi Rich,

> -- it would preclude advance creation of a file actions object which
> will open or dup onto high fd numbers at a later time after the rlimit
> has been increased.

This is a highly theoretical use-case, isn't it?

If you think POSIX should not specify things the way it does, please
report it to the Austin Group.

Bruno