Re: Todo for release?

[Richard Pennington <rich@pennware.com>]

On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 02:57:09 PM Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 07:45:01PM +0200, Daniel Cegiełka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Very helpful would be support for fts.h in musl:
> > 
> > http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man3/fts.3.html
> 
> Can these functions be implemented purely as library functionality,
> without any hooks into libc internals? I was thinking it might be nice
> to isolate all such code into a single subtree in musl, so that folks
> wanting to use it outside musl (either directly in application source
> trees, or in libraries) could easily find and use it.
> 
> Of course there's also the option of putting such code in a separate
> library outside of libc (i.e. not including it in libc) which some
> people might prefer, but if it's small and historically in libcs and
> doesn't create maintenance burden, I'm not opposed to having it in
> libc..
> 
> Rich

I used the NetBSD version and it built with musl just fine with no internal 
stuff, as I recall.

http://ellcc.org/viewvc/svn/ellcc/trunk/libecc/src/musl/src/bsd/

-Rich