From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 19827 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2022 07:59:42 -0000 Received: from mother.openwall.net (195.42.179.200) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Apr 2022 07:59:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 3553 invoked by uid 550); 2 Apr 2022 07:59:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 3518 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2022 07:59:38 -0000 To: musl@lists.openwall.com References: <64c0ef49-4618-8eca-c826-bd2a840c284b@loongson.cn> <20220331184719.GH7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> From: =?UTF-8?B?546L5rSq5Lqu?= Message-ID: <1fec7c01-ea91-aa7c-d6d5-474c00d9347c@loongson.cn> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 15:59:25 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220331184719.GH7074@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf9DxvxNdAkhifLgVAA--.25399S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Kry7Wryruw4UXrWrXr1rXrb_yoW8Gw1DpF ya9F1Fkrs0kry7Cr9Iy3Wrur1ayr1xJryaqw15t348CrnxtryfJr40vas8C3WUAw1fuw12 vF4I9r47Z3WDZaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUv0b7Iv0xC_KF4lb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r1j6r4UM7CY07I2 0VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rw A2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Xr0_Ar1l84ACjcxK6xII jxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I 8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI 64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8Jw Am72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41lc7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCY 02Avz4vE-syl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4 xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1j6r15 MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I 0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8 P5r7UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: pzdqwxxrqjzxhdqjqz5rrqw2lrqou0/ Subject: Re: [musl] Re: add loongarch64 port 在 2022/4/1 上午2:47, Rich Felker 写道: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 02:20:51PM +0800, 王洪亮 wrote: >> 在 2022/3/29 下午4:26, Arnd Bergmann 写道: >>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 10:12 AM 王洪亮 wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we have published 0001-add-loongarch64-port-v2.patch in >>>> >>>> https://github.com/loongson/musl/tree/loongarch-v1.0. >>>> >>>> The patch v2 fixed the issues pointed out in v1. >>>> >>>> have any other issues to modify? >>> I see you still refer to the system calls that I asked to be removed from >>> the kernel: clone() and the old stat() family (pre-statx). Please use >>> only the system calls that are actually supported in mainline kernels, >>> otherwise it does not work. >> Hi,  Arnd >> >> I understand the new system call is clone3() ? >> >> I found musl does not support the clone3() call now, I can implement the >> >> clone3() in LoongArch for future called. > The point isn't that there should be a clone3() function (there > shouldn't) but that __clone has to be implemented by making the > __NR_clone3 syscall not the (nonexistant) __NR_clone syscall. > Rich Hi, Rich I understand the meaning is that keep the architecture-independent code and the __clone input parameter unchanged,within the __clone, convert input parameter to clone3 parameter, and then __NR_clone3 syscall. will that confusion between clone and clone3? Hongliang Wang