From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/308 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Unit tests Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:36:05 +0400 Message-ID: <20110429053605.GA27053@openwall.com> References: <20110410044515.GB13185@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4DA73605.9080107@gmail.com> <20110414231140.GO13185@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4DB5CCCD.7020104@gmail.com> <20110427004239.GY277@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4DB7B7CB.8020608@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312595716 11530 80.91.229.12 (6 Aug 2011 01:55:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:55:16 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: envelope-from@hidden Fri Apr 29 05:43:18 2011 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4DB7B7CB.8020608@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:308 Archived-At: On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 08:29:31AM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > I've come up with "C Library Unit Test Suite" - cluts, which sounds like > "klutz" (besides being klutzy of itself). "cluts" sounds good to me. What license is it going to be under? I propose cut-down BSD (to the point of being copyright only, with no restrictions): This software is Copyright (c) YEAR YOUR NAME , and it is hereby released to the general public under the following terms: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted. This should be compatible with any other Open Source license, which I think is a plus. We currently use this for contributions to JtR: http://openwall.info/wiki/john/licensing I see little reason to have GPL-like restrictions on the unit tests; I think that would do more harm than good. Alexander