From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/323 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Unit tests Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 17:52:45 +0400 Message-ID: <20110502135245.GA18428@openwall.com> References: <20110410044515.GB13185@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <87bozlv621.fsf@gmail.com> <20110502124922.GA17994@openwall.com> <201105020602.15342.errno@cox.net> <20110502131124.GH277@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20110502133028.GA18325@openwall.com> <20110502133257.GJ277@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312595724 11596 80.91.229.12 (6 Aug 2011 01:55:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 01:55:24 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: envelope-from@hidden Mon May 02 13:52:53 2011 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110502133257.GJ277@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:323 Archived-At: On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:32:57AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:30:28PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:11:24AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > Wow licenses are a much more popular discussion topic than > > > development... > > > > Sorry about that. I should have posted the development related stuff I > > told you on IRC yesterday to this mailing list instead. I will do that > > next time. In fact... I'll post some of it in here now. :-) > > On mplayer, we called this kind of topic a bikeshed. ;-) Right. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/mailing-list-faq/bikeshed.html http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshed Yet I think it is fairly important to decide on a license for the unit tests suite. Perhaps you can just make a determination? I want to make sure that whatever code Luka submits always has a suitable license on it. This is my responsibility as a GSoC org admin. In fact, once we decide on a license to use (at least initially), I think we should ask Luka to re-post the code he has already written with the proper licensing statement on it. Alexander