From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: FreeSec DES-based crypt(3)
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 22:03:36 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502180336.GA20095@openwall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110502134952.GK277@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:49:52AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> I could consider using malloc to obtain
> a permanent des state, allocated and initialized on first use, with
> fallback to the stack if malloc fails.
This makes sense.
You might be over-estimating the cost of non-const static storage,
though. It will only consume address space, not actual memory, until a
process actually invokes crypt(3) for a DES-based hash, in which case
the cost will be the same as above.
> But I'm wondering if it's
> really desirable for crypt to be fast anyway. Surely JtR wants a fast
> crypt, but my impression was always that slow crypt was a cheap way to
> get some added defense against brute force login attempts and such...
There's a difference between inherently slow crypt and merely a slow
implementation, and remote attacks are better dealt with in a different
way, in my opinion. I don't want to discuss another bikeshed, so I'd
rather not go into detail.
JtR doesn't actually care much - it has its own optimized DES code (it'd
care about SHA-crypt's speed, because it doesn't support that natively
yet), but I just thought that you'd want musl not to be 50x slower than
glibc at this.
> P.S. crypt is in no way integrated with other parts of libc, so
> linking with -lfastcrypt (separate library) is a potentially viable
> option for situations where you want a fast one.
I think you'd want the default to be fast. The approach with malloc
sounds fine to me - that way, you initially preserve the address space
as well.
Thanks,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 13:43 Solar Designer
2011-05-02 13:49 ` Rich Felker
2011-05-02 18:03 ` Solar Designer [this message]
2011-05-02 19:01 ` Rich Felker
2011-05-23 12:50 ` Solar Designer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110502180336.GA20095@openwall.com \
--to=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).