From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/141
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: cluts review
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:37:57 +0400
Message-ID: <20110713143757.GC23463@openwall.com>
References: <20110713110723.GA22153@openwall.com> <4E1D8964.3020502@gmail.com> <20110713122128.GA22658@openwall.com> <20110713140304.GE16618@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310567883 17877 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 14:38:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:38:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-225-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 13 16:37:59 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-225-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-225-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Qh0Zb-0000oX-OR
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:37:59 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 29798 invoked by uid 550); 13 Jul 2011 14:37:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 29790 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2011 14:37:59 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110713140304.GE16618@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:141
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/141>

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:03:04AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 04:21:28PM +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > Instead of <sys/param.h> 
> > > for PATH_MAX, will limits.h do (that's what i usually include)?
> > 
> > No, it doesn't get PATH_MAX defined for me.
> 
> Even with _POSIX_C_SOURCE=200809L?

I didn't try this one.  Now that I did, PATH_MAX gets defined.  In fact,
my addition of _BSD_SOURCE for scandir() and alphasort() also got
PATH_MAX defined with <limits.h>.  I didn't notice because I was trying
one change at a time.

Alexander