From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/148 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: cluts review Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:05:51 +0400 Message-ID: <20110713170551.GA25095@openwall.com> References: <20110713110723.GA22153@openwall.com> <4E1D8964.3020502@gmail.com> <20110713160327.GA24660@openwall.com> <4E1DCDE5.1040008@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310576764 14402 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 17:06:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:06:04 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-232-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 13 19:05:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh2sm-0003Sz-5A for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:05:56 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 27845 invoked by uid 550); 13 Jul 2011 17:05:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 27837 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2011 17:05:55 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E1DCDE5.1040008@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:148 Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:55:01PM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > On 07/13/2011 06:03 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > >I got lots of errors from "numeric" - I didn't bother recording most. > >The above are just a few of them. > > In my opinion, the errors are warranted. Quite possibly they are. I did not review them at all. I am leaving that for you and Rich. > >The 'numeric' test collection failed 16384 test(s). > > Hmm, is it an up-to-date version of cluts.c? The number is overblown. cluts as of 10 hours ago or so. > >Test collections passed: 1/4 > > > >This is the known issue with number of failed test collections, right? > >Should have been 2, I guess. > > This is the number of passed collections. I don't know why it says "out > of four" here, if you still have the buf.c-less version :-/ This version did have buf.c. Alexander