From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/152 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Daily reports: Friday Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:46:02 +0400 Message-ID: <20110713194602.GA26189@openwall.com> References: <4E125DBC.9090809@gmail.com> <4E131E8F.9@gmail.com> <4E14C55E.6030808@gmail.com> <4E16141F.5060303@gmail.com> <4E17877E.30907@gmail.com> <20110709115301.GA6510@openwall.com> <4E187422.6070601@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310586372 11337 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2011 19:46:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:46:12 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-236-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Jul 13 21:46:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qh5Nn-0003xi-Fn for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 21:46:07 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 11649 invoked by uid 550); 13 Jul 2011 19:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 11641 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2011 19:46:06 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E187422.6070601@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:152 Archived-At: Luka - On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 05:30:42PM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > Oh, ok. I should've ommitted the "-cont" I agree. However, being Re:'s > to each other, I hope they still fall under the same thread. JFYI: "Re:" has nothing to do with threading, which normally works based on Message-Id/In-Reply-To/References headers (this is what blists uses, and I think Gmane does as well). So you may completely change the Subject, but as long as you use your MUA's "reply" feature, you add to the same thread. Some mailing list archives do substring match on Subjects, though - I think MARC does. But adding "Re:" doesn't help them either. > As an > orientation, I may use the latest commits eg "strn.c + comon/String.c" > as part of the Subject, or I may drop differentiation completely and > just have us rely on time stamps. In the end, there's always this to > monitor specific commits: https://github.com/lmarcetic/cluts/commits/master Please continue to post daily reports. Start the message Subjects with "cluts: " and follow that with either the report's date (e.g., "07/13") or specific info on changes made (e.g., "such-and-such tests"). And please continue to post weekly reports as well - on Mondays. These should summarize your accomplishments for last week and describe what you intend to work on next. I feel that the daily communication, while very helpful, is no replacement for weekly summaries. Thanks, Alexander