From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/160 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: cluts: strerror_r() test (was: Daily cluts reports) Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 13:57:30 +0400 Message-ID: <20110714095730.GF27991@openwall.com> References: <4E125DBC.9090809@gmail.com> <4E131E8F.9@gmail.com> <4E14C55E.6030808@gmail.com> <4E16141F.5060303@gmail.com> <4E17877E.30907@gmail.com> <20110709115301.GA6510@openwall.com> <20110710145201.GB133@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4E1B8041.1050602@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310637463 7630 80.91.229.12 (14 Jul 2011 09:57:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 09:57:43 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-244-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Jul 14 11:57:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QhIfm-000065-UR for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:57:35 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 9376 invoked by uid 550); 14 Jul 2011 09:57:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 9368 invoked from network); 14 Jul 2011 09:57:34 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E1B8041.1050602@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:160 Archived-At: Luka, Rich - On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:59:13AM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > I've finished what was previously known as strn.c, and now is buf.c, and > committed it (task VI. Functions which return strings in caller-provided > buffers). If I missed any functions, let me know. You'll notice probably > right of the back that tests for two functions are commented out. Well > that's because one is faulty in glibc, and the other I assume not > implemented in musl (that's in order). I've uncommented the test for strerror_r(), which you marked "glibc fail", and it passed the test on glibc 2.3.6 for me. What exactly was wrong with it (or rather with glibc) in your testing? Thanks, Alexander