From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: holywar: malloc() vs. OOM
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:27:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110724132704.GK132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110724132913.GH27634@port70.net>
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:29:14PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > > Probably I overestimate the importance of OOM errors, and (1) in
> > > particular. However, I think it is worth discussing.
> >
> > I don't think you overestimate the importance of OOM errors. Actually
> > Linux desktop is full of OOM errors that ruin usability, like file
> > managers that hang the system for 5 minutes then crash if you navigate
> > to a directory with a 15000x15000 image file. Unfortunately I don't
> > think it's possible to fix at the libc level, and fixing the worst
> > issues (DoS from apps crashing when they should not crash) usually
> > involves both sanity-checking the size prior to calling malloc *and*
> > checking the return value of malloc...
>
> what about providing an alternative libc or libcwrapper api
I think this is definitely possible, probably just via
-I/path/to/alt/stdlib/h and some inline code and macros in the
stdlib.h there, along with #include_next <stdlib.h>, and it probably
doesn't really need cooperation with libc (i.e. if it's written
cleanly enough it would probably work with most libcs.
> it could "fix" deprecated/dangerous calls
> (maybe turn them into compiletime errors)
> and things like oom failures into runtime errors
>
> so bad code can be compiled against this radical extremist libc
The only problem I see is that it only catches "known bad" code. As an
admin I would be inclined to simply look for another program that
performs the function I need, rather than trying to compile in
workarounds, if I knew a program had code that bad..
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-24 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-24 10:33 Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 12:40 ` Rich Felker
2011-07-24 13:29 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2011-07-24 13:27 ` Rich Felker [this message]
2011-07-24 18:33 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 22:24 ` Rich Felker
2011-07-24 18:25 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-24 22:19 ` Rich Felker
2011-07-25 17:43 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-25 19:21 ` Rich Felker
2011-07-24 12:44 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2011-07-24 12:53 ` Szabolcs Nagy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110724132704.GK132@brightrain.aerifal.cx \
--to=dalias@aerifal.cx \
--cc=musl@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/musl/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).