From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/348
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: musl path
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 10:06:18 -0400
Message-ID: <20110807140618.GH132@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
References: <589f298577c7ae68a4e66f1b6f2ee488@smtp1.ispfr.net>
 <20110806162803.GX29562@port70.net>
 <a75d5bdb076fd87cb76492139d52b88b@smtp1.ispfr.net>
 <20110806202736.GE132@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <CAK8RtFoVs=pfXmozTQML3MPeVQ3O3dGZZFQd8dZyU6nphHGh3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312726738 21314 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2011 14:18:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 14:18:58 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-349-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Aug 07 16:18:53 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-349-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-349-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Qq4Bp-0008Hb-98
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:18:53 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 22104 invoked by uid 550); 7 Aug 2011 14:18:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 22096 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2011 14:18:52 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK8RtFoVs=pfXmozTQML3MPeVQ3O3dGZZFQd8dZyU6nphHGh3Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:348
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/348>

On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 12:46:47PM +0200, Jens Staal wrote:
> I would definitely like the idea of the wrapper being a general tool
> for various libc's.
> 
> Especially nice in order to play with the libc benchmarks (I tried
> making AURs for them but could not figure out how to get the different
> builds to use the different libcs installed on the system).
> 
> If the wrappers also could include a number of different compilers,
> that would be great :)

I think for most compilers it's trivial. As far as I know, gcc is the
only one I know that insists on still passing all the unwanted -L
paths to the linker even when you told it -nostdlib...

Rich