From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/350
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Compilation error
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 21:36:58 +0200
Message-ID: <20110807193658.GA29562@port70.net>
References: <6b8e6a08f65ec476283a3699a41451d7@smtp1.ispfr.net>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312745838 27200 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2011 19:37:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 19:37:18 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-351-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Aug 07 21:37:13 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-351-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-351-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Qq99r-0005hg-55
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2011 21:37:11 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 21710 invoked by uid 550); 7 Aug 2011 19:37:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 21702 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2011 19:37:10 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6b8e6a08f65ec476283a3699a41451d7@smtp1.ispfr.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:350
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/350>

* nicolas@atelier-web.com <nicolas@atelier-web.com> [2011-08-07 20:57:11 +0200]:
> I tried to compile musl with the pcc compiler, but it failed because of :
> 
> $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -Wl,-soname=libc.so -o $@ $(LOBJS) -lgcc
> 
> Is the option -lgcc really necessary ?
> I had removed it, and the compilation succeeded :)

with pcc you don't need -lgcc obviously
with gcc you need it

btw pcc cannot build a correct musl now
clock_gettime refers to a weak symbol
but pcc does not know __attribute__((weak))
so __vdso_clock_gettime ends up being
an undefined symbol

(there are various kinds of weakref related
attributes and it's a known defect in pcc
http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/jira/browse/PCC-362 )

musl mostly uses weak aliases which happen
to work with pcc imho clock_gettime is the
only exception..