From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/356 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Compilation error Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:00:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20110807220025.GL132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <6b8e6a08f65ec476283a3699a41451d7@smtp1.ispfr.net> <20110807193658.GA29562@port70.net> <20110807193431.GI132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20110807195006.GJ132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20110807220940.GC29562@port70.net> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312755186 17651 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2011 22:13:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 22:13:06 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-357-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Aug 08 00:13:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqBae-0006L9-UR for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:13:01 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 23579 invoked by uid 550); 7 Aug 2011 22:13:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 23571 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2011 22:13:00 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110807220940.GC29562@port70.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:356 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:09:40AM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Rich Felker [2011-08-07 15:50:06 -0400]: > > It should be working with latest commit. If not, please tell me what > > goes wrong. > > > > it seems to work but i'm not sure what the code does > > isn't it enough to > weakalias(sc_clock_gettime, __vdso_clock_gettime); > and then just use __vdso_clock_gettime ? > > (so no __cgt etc) No, because -Bsymbolic-functions binds it at link-time, or in other words, libc.so is intentionally built with no PLT because that makes it faster to start, faster to run, and lighter in memory. Otherwise, without -Bsymbolic-functions, you would be right. > (for some reason dynamic linking with musl fails now if i > compile musl with pcc imho it used to work..) Can you find where it fails? Rich