From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/355
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: Compilation error
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 00:09:40 +0200
Message-ID: <20110807220940.GC29562@port70.net>
References: <6b8e6a08f65ec476283a3699a41451d7@smtp1.ispfr.net>
 <20110807193658.GA29562@port70.net>
 <20110807193431.GI132@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20110807195006.GJ132@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312754997 16499 80.91.229.12 (7 Aug 2011 22:09:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 22:09:57 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-356-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon Aug 08 00:09:53 2011
Return-path: <musl-return-356-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-356-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1QqBXd-0005YW-E6
	for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:09:53 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 21881 invoked by uid 550); 7 Aug 2011 22:09:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 21873 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2011 22:09:52 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110807195006.GJ132@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:355
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/355>

* Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx> [2011-08-07 15:50:06 -0400]:
> It should be working with latest commit. If not, please tell me what
> goes wrong.
> 

it seems to work but i'm not sure what the code does

isn't it enough to
weakalias(sc_clock_gettime, __vdso_clock_gettime);
and then just use __vdso_clock_gettime ?

(so no __cgt etc)


(for some reason dynamic linking with musl fails now if i
compile musl with pcc imho it used to work..)