From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/381 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: cluts makefiles Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:49:26 +0400 Message-ID: <20110810114926.GA30983@openwall.com> References: <20110809113045.GA12614@albatros> <4E4156DA.1060107@gmail.com> <20110809161142.GA2409@albatros> <4E419688.5030005@gmail.com> <20110810030634.GC28119@openwall.com> <4E426B9B.3030100@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312976973 26540 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2011 11:49:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:49:33 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-382-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Aug 10 13:49:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr7Hs-00087p-JB for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:49:28 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 7729 invoked by uid 550); 10 Aug 2011 11:49:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 7721 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2011 11:49:28 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E426B9B.3030100@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:381 Archived-At: On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:29:31PM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > On 08/10/2011 05:06 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > >To apply a patch, you do not need two trees, and you do not need to > >match the top-level directory names to those seen in the patch file. > >Rather, you may do something like: > > > >cp -a cluts cluts-to-patch > >cd cluts-to-patch > >patch -p1< ../patch-file > > Hmm, I did try`patch -p1 < ../patch-file` *shrugs* > Still, thanks you for the instructions anyway. At least I can be sure > what I'm doing. Well, it sounds like your source tree was in fact changed from the revision that Vasiliy's patch was for, then. Such things happen. Alexander