From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/383 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New daily reports - nothing Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:56:54 +0400 Message-ID: <20110810115654.GB30983@openwall.com> References: <4E3A79B2.8090204@gmail.com> <4E3B331E.7050502@gmail.com> <4E3CC5AC.3070404@gmail.com> <4E3DFB5D.8040008@gmail.com> <20110807073224.GG132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <4E3F10C7.4060601@gmail.com> <4E40A33F.7090804@gmail.com> <4E41E020.7020109@gmail.com> <20110810020218.GA27745@openwall.com> <4E426A1A.3000601@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312977430 29383 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2011 11:57:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 11:57:10 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-384-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Aug 10 13:57:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qr7P7-0003Hs-Tz for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:56:58 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 16316 invoked by uid 550); 10 Aug 2011 11:56:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 16307 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2011 11:56:57 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E426A1A.3000601@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:383 Archived-At: Luka, On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > On 08/10/2011 04:02 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > >P.S. Your use of "Re:" on ever-changing Subjects remains completely > >ridiculous. As explained before, this has nothing to do with threading, > >but it breaks the convention of "Re:" being followed by the previous > >message's Subject (that you're replying to). For your use, it's best > >not to include "Re:". > > My bad, I should stay within the same thread though (regardless of > loosing the "Re:" and changing the subject), right? Not necessarily. If I were you, I'd be starting a new thread with each daily report. Then possible comments on your daily report, such as from Rich, would be in the thread with that daily report. But the next daily report will start a new thread and have its comments, if any, in that new thread. Otherwise, you have a thread that spans multiple months and multiple topics around cluts, with the only thing in common being that it is about daily reports for cluts. Another thing you could improve is always mention cluts in the Subject of your daily reports because this mailing list is not limited to cluts - in fact, it is primarily about musl rather than cluts. Something like "cluts report for 8/10 - implemented this and that" (with 8/10 being today's date) will work better. Thanks, Alexander