From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/399 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: cluts daily reports 08/11 - fixes to buf and alloc Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:08:24 +0400 Message-ID: <20110811190824.GA2157@openwall.com> References: <4E433AF0.90609@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313089714 744 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2011 19:08:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:08:34 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-400-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Aug 11 21:08:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QracH-0002Di-7p for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 21:08:29 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 3858 invoked by uid 550); 11 Aug 2011 19:08:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 3850 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2011 19:08:28 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E433AF0.90609@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:399 Archived-At: Luka - On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:14:08AM +0200, Luka Marčetić wrote: > Buf should work now I guess (comitted), alloc still needs work around > for some specifics - albeit arguably rational - of musl. > So that's the priority, along with finishing pthread_eintr. > > tests/alloc.c | 35 > tests/buf.c | 113 - Thanks for the report. Where's the final line of diffstat output, though? The above says that you mostly deleted a few lines from buf.c, but it does not tell how many and whether you also added/edited anything. Overall, it does show that you made very little progress. You should try not only to fix problems in code already written, but also make progress at further tasks each and every day. Maybe limit your fixing of existing code to 4 hours per day (this sounds excessive to me, but it works as an upper limit), and use the rest of time (4+ hours per day since you need to work hard during the remaining GSoC time) for writing new code. How does this sound to you? Alexander