From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/422 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Daily reports Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:57:45 +0400 Message-ID: <20110816065745.GA21828@openwall.com> References: <4E49B3ED.6010508@gmail.com> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313477878 18001 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2011 06:57:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:57:58 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-423-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Aug 16 08:57:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QtDaw-0000bc-Sp for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:57:51 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 1837 invoked by uid 550); 16 Aug 2011 06:57:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 1829 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2011 06:57:49 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E49B3ED.6010508@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:422 Archived-At: Luka, On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 02:03:57AM +0200, Luka Mar??eti?? wrote: > Finished what I thought was going to be pthread_eintr (though it turns > out there are like 70 more functions that I didn't know about which I > brought up on IRC) > Updated stuff to make sure it compiles with both glibc's (Makefile) > Generated some doxygen docs, but won't upload yet, not showing what I want. By "both glibc's", do you actually mean "both libc's" - glibc and musl? In the Subjects of your daily reports, please mention cluts and the date the report is for. That way, it will be easier to see which report any follow-up postings apply to, and it will be more difficult for you to miss a report. ;-) There should have been a weekly report from you yesterday, in addition to the daily report, but I recall that you see no need for these when you're providing daily reports. I disagree, but as we're getting closer to the end of GSoC time, I am not going to insist on this anymore. It would be just two more weekly reports anyway (yesterday's and another one), unless you choose to continue the practice beyond GSoC term (which would be nice). Thanks, Alexander