From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/535 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Szabolcs Nagy Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: compatability: heirloom-utils +.5, libarchive -1 Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:08:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20120106140841.GM14961@port70.net> References: <20120103060600.2190fc2b@newbook> <20120103173808.GH14961@port70.net> <20120104180526.05c071fe@newbook> <20120106084110.GA132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325858938 29216 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2012 14:08:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:08:58 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-536-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jan 06 15:08:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RjATV-0002hR-Td for gllmg-musl@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:08:54 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 25925 invoked by uid 550); 6 Jan 2012 14:08:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 25917 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2012 14:08:53 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120106084110.GA132@brightrain.aerifal.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:535 Archived-At: * Rich Felker [2012-01-06 03:41:10 -0500]: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 06:05:26PM -0800, Isaac Dunham wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:38:08 +0100 > > In general, the POSIX variants are about as close to precisely > > standards-conformant as you can get; unfortunately, the plain old UNIX > > versions are default. I note, though, that nl presumably ought to start > > numbering at 0 when specified; instead, it starts at 1 (SU3/SUS > > variants), skipping the line that would be numbered 0. The old unix > > version apparently didn't recognize -b. > > But I figure it beats Busybox any day--and I'd rather not use GNU > > bloat. > > I'm not sure what you're talking about. Busybox does not contain GNU imho he meant that heirloom beats busybox in posix conformance and functionality and much less bloated than gnu