From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/725 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: musl 0.8.8 released Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 22:21:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20120418222157.0f4e43ba@newbook> References: <20120418090756.GW7281@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120418191328.5ea16f57@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334812940 2632 80.91.229.3 (19 Apr 2012 05:22:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 05:22:20 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-726-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Thu Apr 19 07:22:14 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKjoq-0006p5-LR for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:22:12 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 2009 invoked by uid 550); 19 Apr 2012 05:22:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 2001 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2012 05:22:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=ZmLr1QbWtfA0SiJWC0ZGKguYI95MRBA/gE/sDPcMU9nrTS5cpLa4L/5DAmGH+GcDMfrszB2YqhNxOrDh85u01qSDFHX9OFRcj0ksifEoAtuqFqfbAeLydwA+3Dkzb/YtslI8Vd7DqmOlvgcOm4lYZ88XR+2Rp5EWujcDH1fqqzs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <20120418191328.5ea16f57@newbook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:725 Archived-At: On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 19:13:28 -0700 Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:07:56 -0400 > Rich Felker wrote: > > > With this release, musl seems to have complete interface-level > > coverage of ISO C99 and POSIX 2008. There are still some features > I forget what they were, but ISTR seeing one or two missing functions > in one of the headers I worked on. Ignore the above claim--looking back over the headers, I guess I was wrong. Isaac Dunham