From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/744 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New gcc wrapper to try Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:45:26 -0700 Message-ID: <20120421154526.f7257d3a.idunham@lavabit.com> References: <20120421064933.GF14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335048347 32351 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2012 22:45:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 22:45:47 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-745-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sun Apr 22 00:45:43 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SLj3l-0001OF-EJ for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2012 00:45:41 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 16119 invoked by uid 550); 21 Apr 2012 22:45:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 16109 invoked from network); 21 Apr 2012 22:45:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=IsL7enxRWCgkuLFrsQ81CdhYneuRvGcYBOvuhFJM16Mtic0zBAYWsIQWvdh+9rMNgvGbTepbJaUOtxuB4wMPAXIraotMcbf/8X2VgJTk1VT5mifW05ZJULeb9YFFYesKAwFdWdtjYt3utUspPryxPvdCSGpfvnFD4nrm3tgbtdc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <20120421064933.GF14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:744 Archived-At: On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 02:49:33 -0400 Rich Felker wrote: > Hi, > Here's the latest draft of a new concept for the musl-gcc gcc wrapper. > It's almost entirely gcc specfile-based. If it works well, I intend to > move even more of what it does into the specfile, and instead of > generating the specfile at runtime each time it's run, just have it > generated at build time and installed with musl. > Please let me know how it works. (You'll need to edit the first couple > lines to set the paths/arch if you don't use the defaults.) I intend to test it, but have some work to do beforehand. I've been using /opt/musl, myself. By the way, I had an idea for handling musl-gcc -V: if [ "-V" = "$1" ] gcc="gcc -V $2" shift 2 fi -- Isaac Dunham