From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/765 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Request for comments: website updates? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:55:24 -0700 Message-ID: <20120424125524.1d699880@newbook> References: <20120424010116.GO14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335297337 32537 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2012 19:55:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:55:37 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-766-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Apr 24 21:55:36 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMlpo-0002Ix-Ew for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:55:36 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5229 invoked by uid 550); 24 Apr 2012 19:55:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 5221 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2012 19:55:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=SeQxHQ/SwLXw9ACjUCA1r6QTc2/r5XpLG+wLFjwNtdM+9YQIwi/+RxZmTcPECsmXSjIbXprarOneN8K2acssYmcnhRuPh4/gRNIae7rrAb15BfYfj4MogXAfNtqLtE8gq331ITiop8LdxurNhzDwRZIjV+69xBn9jzs7LaeWc8Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <20120424010116.GO14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:765 Archived-At: On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:01:16 -0400 Rich Felker wrote: > I know a lot of stuff in the musl website is a bit outdated, lacking > in details, etc. and I'd appreciate some ideas to get it more > useful/informative between now and the 0.9 release. Website is a GREAT > bikeshed so come on everybody, have at it.. ;-) > Update the comparisons? IIRC, glibc has dropped the rpc headers and expect a third-party implementation to be used (tirpc was one, IIRC). The ABI is still present there. Sizes for musl are outdated (~575k libc.so, nearly 1.4 MB libc.a here).