From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/767 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Solar Designer Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: New gcc wrapper to try Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:28:40 +0400 Message-ID: <20120424212840.GA13491@openwall.com> References: <20120421064933.GF14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120421203751.GG14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120422225704.75a67b0b@newbook> <20120423091905.GM14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120424122828.50cdc737@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335302934 15143 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2012 21:28:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:28:54 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-768-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Tue Apr 24 23:28:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMnI2-0004HD-OF for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:28:50 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 13440 invoked by uid 550); 24 Apr 2012 21:28:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 13432 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2012 21:28:49 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120424122828.50cdc737@newbook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:767 Archived-At: Rich, Isaac - On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:28:28PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:19:05 -0400 Rich Felker wrote: > > Somebody has enabled stack protector. Either your distro (what distro > > are you using) has hacked gcc in a way different from what musl-gcc > > expects, or wireless-tools' makefile is adding -fstack-protector... > > There's no -fstack-protector, so it's Ubuntu's fault. Several distros do it these days (and Owl will start doing it soon as well), so it's becoming standard and needs to be supported. Technically, -fno-stack-protector in the musl-gcc wrapper would probably make things appear to work, but it's not necessarily a good thing to do since it might violate reasonable expectations of the user. I think it'd be better for musl to start providing the necessary symbols. Alexander