From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/773
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: New gcc wrapper to try
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 05:21:48 +0400
Message-ID: <20120425012148.GA14929@openwall.com>
References: <20120421064933.GF14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120421203751.GG14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120422225704.75a67b0b@newbook> <20120423091905.GM14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120424122828.50cdc737@newbook> <20120424212840.GA13491@openwall.com> <20120424214127.GQ14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120424221040.GS14673@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120424221423.GA13817@openwall.com> <20120424235339.GV16237@port70.net>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1335316913 24485 80.91.229.3 (25 Apr 2012 01:21:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:21:53 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-774-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Wed Apr 25 03:21:52 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-774-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-774-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1SMqvX-00026Q-7f
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 03:21:51 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 8025 invoked by uid 550); 25 Apr 2012 01:21:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 8017 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2012 01:21:50 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120424235339.GV16237@port70.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:773
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/773>

On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 01:53:39AM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> btw i noticed that with the modified gcc where
> -fstack-protector is enabled by default, the
> stricter -fstack-protector-all does not work
> (at least here with gcc 4.4.3)

Ouch.  I brought this up on owl-dev so that we test for it when getting
this change into Owl:

http://www.openwall.com/lists/owl-dev/2012/04/25/1

Thanks,

Alexander