From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/848
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Kurt H Maier <khm-lists@intma.in>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: gcc segfault at src/mman/mlockall.c
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:13:03 -0400
Message-ID: <20120518231303.GA80230@intma.in>
References: <20120515094236.53718e47@newbook>
 <20120515192104.GQ17860@port70.net>
 <20120515193053.GR17860@port70.net>
 <20120516115341.27f0c77b@newbook>
 <20120516220457.GU17860@port70.net>
 <CAK8RtFpxzhHHqO929YPnmYebt_SQscSWB-UWbcJz=cnzGi3bgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <874nrdmmlz.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CAK8RtFqF2haiB-ZG+9ezPAAoJTpVedKEWZv+uXJMgfgOD1HAdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120518185123.GA33876@intma.in>
 <20120518225845.GY163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337382796 3627 80.91.229.3 (18 May 2012 23:13:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 23:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-849-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat May 19 01:13:15 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-849-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-849-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1SVWMF-0006b9-HN
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2012 01:13:15 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 16013 invoked by uid 550); 18 May 2012 23:13:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 16005 invoked from network); 18 May 2012 23:13:15 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120518225845.GY163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:848
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/848>

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 06:58:45PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> 
> By the way, sbase in its current form is not much of an option. As far
> as I can tell, the only way its tools "suck less" is in the area of
> bloat; in the area of actually working correctly, they leave A LOT to
> be desired.


Hence "flesh out" rather than "deploy."