From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/869 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Isaac Dunham Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: getpass misplaced Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 20:38:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20120520203800.3ee079d0@newbook> References: <20120520192550.2cef3782@newbook> <20120521030106.GD163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337571502 10262 80.91.229.3 (21 May 2012 03:38:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 03:38:22 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-870-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon May 21 05:38:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWJRo-0005dy-Rz for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 05:38:16 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 21737 invoked by uid 550); 21 May 2012 03:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 21728 invoked from network); 21 May 2012 03:38:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lavabit; d=lavabit.com; b=QADr8SZYHCZ9gMbat9MXnAh89ulglpg1/qN4r3zEJCi8Y+JMA0hOSQLWBCs/xOXlqD3u3k+ePgOErm+Ki6D4Cukj8OAUtnc7ausetfrYaM6E5+XlDIhaOSr37MQw4ui3OfQGu005tTpXG1yerVrde8Sfl46JxCj23ux67WV46Hk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; In-Reply-To: <20120521030106.GD163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:869 Archived-At: On Sun, 20 May 2012 23:01:06 -0400 Rich Felker wrote: > > This has me down to 22 headers that still need work/reviewing. > > Here's the TODO for _BSD_SOURCE: Note: the TODO is a list of files to review autogenerated by grepping for MISC or BSD in headers from glibc. Some of these can be expected to work with _BSD_SOURCE already, because glibc uses so many feature tests. > > > > include/tgmath.h > > This is purely C99 stuff; I don't think GNU would add anything. > > > include/glob.h > > We don't support the extensions here, and even if we want to have the > macros for extension flags, they seem to be in the reserved namespace > and thus ok to defined unconditionall. > > > include/shadow.h > > include/endian.h > > These are nonstandard and in principle don't need any feature test > macros. However, we use them in endian.h so that other headers can > include endian.h. > > > could cause breakage without extension. I forget > > exactly what the problem was, though. > ..what? Extremely bad wording on my part. _BSD_SOURCE or _GNU_SOURCE make these structs available in glibc: group_req, group_source_req, group_filter, ip_msfilter I had forgotten which structs as of the last mail. I'd expect breakage without them, though I guess we could wait and see. Isaac Dunham