From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/871 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Question on setjmp.h Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 00:53:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20120521045328.GE163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20120520192550.2cef3782@newbook> <20120521030106.GD163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120520215201.3212f252@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337576333 5877 80.91.229.3 (21 May 2012 04:58:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 04:58:53 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-872-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon May 21 06:58:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWKhk-00008S-7O for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 06:58:48 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 30119 invoked by uid 550); 21 May 2012 04:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 30111 invoked from network); 21 May 2012 04:58:47 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120520215201.3212f252@newbook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:871 Archived-At: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:52:01PM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > I'm looking at setjmp.h, and see: > #ifdef _GNU_SOURCE > #define jmp_buf sigjmp_buf /* no other definition for jmp_buf in view */ > #endif It's defined in bits. By the way, this #define is unnecessary; I mistakenly thought it would be useful back when musl's relationship to glibc behavior was less defined. I think I'll remove it. > Still working on _BSD_SOURCE, about 13 headers left now. > I may be optimistic, but it looks like I should have a patch by the end > of the month or perhaps week (assuming I can do something after work). Great! Rich