From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/876 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rich Felker Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: _BSD_SOURCE support for musl ready Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:43:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20120521174349.GF163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> References: <20120520232651.4ed2d315@newbook> <20120521133629.GA9215@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120521101926.52f4aab2@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337622551 14071 80.91.229.3 (21 May 2012 17:49:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:49:11 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-877-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Mon May 21 19:49:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWWjD-0003Ue-W7 for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 19:49:08 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 6046 invoked by uid 550); 21 May 2012 17:49:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 6034 invoked from network); 21 May 2012 17:49:07 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120521101926.52f4aab2@newbook> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:876 Archived-At: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:19:26AM -0700, Isaac Dunham wrote: > OK. > I've put innetgr in its own file under src/stubs/ > This probably means I'd need to change logwtmp, also (I had it in > stubs/utmpx.c) utmpx.c is not a big deal because it's no longer in the standard (it was removed by POSIX 2008). > > Wasn't all of this already coming from strings.h? > > I think I did that before _GNU_SOURCE included strings.h ... > > By the way, I noticed that strings.h seems to be specified (without > bzero & co.) in X/Open 2008. I'm inclined to test like so: These functions were removed in POSIX 2008; previously, they were specified to be declared in strings.h. Rich