From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1001
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: printf POSIX compliance
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 16:04:00 +0200
Message-ID: <20120608140400.GA17860@port70.net>
References: <CAOnWdoihoSttjvTJfR1sTR5xfSJbNGTY8GF4uDE+aBVWBBeXUA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339164256 17491 80.91.229.3 (8 Jun 2012 14:04:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:04:16 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1002-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jun 08 16:04:15 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1002-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1002-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1ScznQ-0002Bs-Mg
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 16:04:12 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 32480 invoked by uid 550); 8 Jun 2012 14:04:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 32472 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2012 14:04:12 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOnWdoihoSttjvTJfR1sTR5xfSJbNGTY8GF4uDE+aBVWBBeXUA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1001
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1001>

* Reuben Thomas <rrt@sc3d.org> [2012-06-08 11:34:04 +0100]:
> I contacted the gnulib maintainers, one of whom replied:
> 
> "IIRC, gnulib's freadahead use is caused by musl's printf not being
> posix compliant, causing gnulib to pull in its printf replacement,
> which doesn't work on musl."
> 

what does freadahead have to do with printf?
that sounds weird..

> It would be nice to sort this out: either musl's printf is not
> POSIX-compliant, or gnulib's detection of POSIX-compliance is buggy.
> 

so far i haven't seen much code from gnulib that was *not* buggy

but yes this should be sorted out..