From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1009
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general
Subject: Re: printf POSIX compliance
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:06:18 +0200
Message-ID: <20120608150618.GB17860@port70.net>
References: <CAOnWdoihoSttjvTJfR1sTR5xfSJbNGTY8GF4uDE+aBVWBBeXUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120608144423.GN163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
 <20120608145519.GP163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339167992 20022 80.91.229.3 (8 Jun 2012 15:06:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2012 15:06:32 +0000 (UTC)
To: musl@lists.openwall.com
Original-X-From: musl-return-1010-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Fri Jun 08 17:06:31 2012
Return-path: <musl-return-1010-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>
Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org
Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200])
	by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <musl-return-1010-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com>)
	id 1Sd0li-0002eI-2X
	for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:06:30 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 1475 invoked by uid 550); 8 Jun 2012 15:06:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:musl@lists.openwall.com>
List-Help: <mailto:musl-help@lists.openwall.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:musl-unsubscribe@lists.openwall.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:musl-subscribe@lists.openwall.com>
Original-Received: (qmail 1467 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2012 15:06:29 -0000
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120608145519.GP163@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1009
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1009>

* Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx> [2012-06-08 10:55:19 -0400]:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 10:44:23AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> > Still working on finding whether this long double issue is what's
> > causign the gnulib junk to get pulled in...
> 
> And it's not, at least not in the worst package, GNU m4. I #if'd out
> the broken long double test in configure, re-ran it, and even with no
> printf problems reported, freadahead is still getting pulled in...
> I'll see if I see anything else odd.
> 

i've just checked m4 and it uses freadseek and closein

both functions are from gnulib and depend on freadahead

so m4 will use freadahead independently of the printf issue