From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.musl.general/1042 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: orc Newsgroups: gmane.linux.lib.musl.general Subject: Re: Re: Vision for new platform Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 23:25:55 +0800 Message-ID: <20120609232555.3f42a95b@sibserver.ru> References: <20120518010620.GW163@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20120609192756.6e72f25e@sibserver.ru> <20120609074426.496a5e13@newbook> Reply-To: musl@lists.openwall.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1339255676 17431 80.91.229.3 (9 Jun 2012 15:27:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 15:27:56 +0000 (UTC) To: musl@lists.openwall.com Original-X-From: musl-return-1043-gllmg-musl=m.gmane.org@lists.openwall.com Sat Jun 09 17:27:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org Original-Received: from mother.openwall.net ([195.42.179.200]) by plane.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SdNZw-0004gP-Di for gllmg-musl@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 17:27:52 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 21644 invoked by uid 550); 9 Jun 2012 15:27:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact musl-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 21613 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2012 15:27:47 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120609074426.496a5e13@newbook> X-Mailer: claws-mail Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.lib.musl.general:1042 Archived-At: On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 07:44:26 -0700 Isaac Dunham wrote: > gentoo is working to support mdev because of that. I've seen gentoo folks just saying "It will be mainstream, so we will not resist". Things got changed? > I presume plain sockets will work for IPC, though? Or am I > underestimating the requirements? I think, yes. Here is a list of already existing unix IPC mechanisms: http://unixbus.org/#unixipc > QCC is tcc + qcg; Rob says he's gotten all the license crap taken care > of but needs time to get it started. The project is on hold, yes. He said that he will start it after toybox 1.0. > So implementations following these principles do have a chance of > going somewhere, though maybe not taking over mainline desktops. > Having a little chance to change the situation completely is not the same as 'just start Yet Another (useless) Distribution of my name'. This (I believe) will be standalone platform if it will happen. Not a Linux distribution. But a project aimed to rip out that all old, bloated and buggy crap we have today.